Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Lifesaving information at your fingertips
The One Resource for EMS, EMTs and Paramedics
Chest pain? MONA no longer answers the door

EMS Medical Equipment Sponsors

Featured Distributors

Featured Product

New Products

Featured Product Categories

EMS Medical Equipment Article

November 01, 2011
Email Print Comment RSS Bookmark


Firemedically
by Mike McEvoy

Chest pain? MONA no longer answers the door

By Mike McEvoy

Bound Tree University

Morphine, oxygen, nitrates, and aspirin — collectively known as MONA — are no longer the preferred door prizes for chest pain patients entering the emergency cardiac care system. The Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC) Guidelines 2010 put the kibosh on the morphine and oxygen piece of MONA after research demonstrated increased mortality from the morphine and no evidence supporting use of oxygen while other data suggested harm, especially with high flow oxygen.

Nitrates and aspirin however, are lifesavers in the setting of suspected acute coronary syndromes. This is great news for BLS providers who are trained and ready to deliver both medications currently recommended for chest pain patients. But are you completely familiar and comfortable with administering nitroglycerine and aspirin? This article will tell you what you need to know.

Of course, morphine and oxygen still have a limited role in acute coronary syndromes. Morphine can be considered for patients whose chest pain continues despite maximal doses on nitroglycerine, something highly unlikely to occur in the prehospital environment or emergency department. Oxygen should still be given for patients with pulse oximetry saturations less than 95% or those in shock, with acute shortness of breath, or signs of heart failure — all relatively uncommon prehospital presentations. That leaves us with nitrates and aspirin.

Nitroglycerine
The most common nitrate is nitroglycerine, available in many different forms, all of which offer the beneficial effects of dilating coronary arteries (particularly in the areas where plaque disruption may be blocking blood flow), and dilating venous blood vessels which reduces resistance to blood flow in the body. Patients with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin should receive up to 3 doses of nitroglycerine given either by sublingual tablets or spray (such as NitroMist), administered at 3 to 5 minute intervals until their pain is relieved, their systolic blood pressure dips below 90 mmHg or systolic blood pressure drops more than 30 mmHg from baseline.

Nitroglycerine is contraindicated in patients with hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg), significant bradycardia (< 50 BPM), right ventricular (RV) infarction, or those who have recently taken a phosphodiesterase inhibitor such as Viagra, Cialis or Levitra. In practice, how would an EMT recognize a patient with an RV infarct and what happens if your patient fails to tell you they took an erectile dysfunction (ED) drug within the previous 24 hours? Well, truth be told, it’s like pornography: you’ll know it when you see it.

Give nitro to an RV infarct patient or one who has taken an ED drug and you’ll quickly see hypotension. Quickly means once the nitro is absorbed which typically takes three to five minutes (a good time to recheck the blood pressure) and hypotension means pretty low BP (usually less than 80 systolic). Don’t panic, though: despite grave warnings to the contrary, it is incredibly hard to find any documented reports of adverse patient outcomes in either of these situations. Instead of going to pieces, lay your patient down and elevate the legs. Doing so takes advantage of a well known ability to raise blood pressure by autotransfusing blood volume from the legs into the central circulation. Pressure will increase and in three to five minutes the nitro will wear off. Enough of that: don’t give the patient any more nitro.

What else do you need to know about nitroglycerine? Well, for starters, it comes in many different forms. There are 272 different nitro products available on the market. They range from inexpensive sublingual tablets to chewable capsules to patches to sublingual spray to paste to intravenous forms. Nitroglycerine tablets are the least expensive and most commonly prescribed.

Tablets are light sensitive (they degrade when exposed to sunlight or high temperatures) and therefore are packaged in small dark colored glass bottles. Once opened, moisture in the air tends to degrade the tablets over the course of several months, so the bottle should be replaced every six months.

Storing the bottle in a pants pocket increases temperature and will accelerate nitro degradation. Tablets that have lost their potency have a sweet taste; tablets with full potency taste bitter, commonly induce a headache, and (obviously) help to relieve chest pain. Ask your patient about the taste of their sublingual nitro tablets. If they report a sweet taste, consider the tablet's lifespan expired and administer additional doses from another source.

Counsel your patients with nitro prescriptions to not carry their bottle in their pants pockets and to refill the prescription every six months. Note also that plastic containers leach nitroglycerine from tablets and from intravenous preparations. Tablets must be kept in the glass container they are dispensed in. Special non-leaching plastic intravenous bags and tubing must be used when infusing nitroglycerine. Lastly, when assisting with administration of nitro tablets, consider using a straw to strategically place the tablets into the buccal mucosa (under the tongue) to avoid placing your fingers into the mouth. Check first to ensure your patient has saliva in their mouth; without saliva, sublingual meds will never dissolve. Nitro spray requires caution as well; EMS providers who get too close to their patient when spraying sublingual nitro spray have been known to experience dizziness and syncope from inhaling the medication mist.

Aspirin
Early administration of aspirin in the setting of acute myocardial infarction has been demonstrated to significantly reduce mortality — so much so that emergency medical dispatch protocols advise patients without contraindications to take aspirin immediately on contacting 911 when acute coronary syndrome is suspected.

The recommended dose is 160 to 325 milligrams. Chewable aspirin is absorbed more quickly than swallowed aspirin. Most dispatch and prehospital protocols recommend chewing four baby aspirins (81 milligrams each). When baby (chewable) aspirin is not available, an adult (325 milligram) aspirin tablet can be chewed (not very tasty but equally effective). If residual aspirin remains in the mouth or no saliva is present, the patient can drink eight ounces of water to increase absorption.

You may be surprised at all the potential sources of aspirin. Aspirin suppositories can be given if a patient is too nauseous to swallow or chew tablets. Aspirin is also a component of many other medications such as Pepto-Bismol; reading medication labels will surprise you. There is also a new powdered aspirin product on the market contained in a foil envelope (Aspirin to Go) that can be kept in a wallet or pocketbook and used in case of headache, injury or administered as a lifesaver in a chest pain emergency.

Aspirin inhibits the action of platelets, preventing their ability to clump together forming clots. Since the mechanism of acute coronary syndrome is usually ruptured plaque in one of the coronary arteries with clot formation obstructing blood flow. Prompt administration of an antiplatelet agent such as aspirin significantly reduces damage and can be lifesaving, the earlier the better, hence the reason why dispatchers recommend it.

Some responders wonder about aspirin overdoses. Let’s say the 911 dispatcher instructs a patient to chew 324 milligrams of baby aspirin, the first responders do the same, and the emergency department gives yet another dose. Is that too much? Not at all, actually. Some therapeutic regimens call for 5,000 milligrams of aspirin daily, depending on the indication. In the setting of a patient with potential acute coronary syndrome, better safe than sorry.

With MONA no longer meeting chest pain patients at the door, it is nice to know that our first responders and EMTs now have the tools and knowledge to deliver life saving interventions to patients who present with chest pain potentially of acute coronary syndrome origin. Keep your focus on nitroglycerine and aspirin. Meeting patients at the door with these two medications will improve outcomes and help you to help your patients.

References:

O'Connor RE, Brady W, Brooks SC, Diercks D, Egan J, Ghaemmaghami C, Menon V, O'Neil BJ, Travers AH and Yannopoulos D. Part 10: Acute Coronary Syndromes: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010;122;S787-S817.

Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Pinsky M and Teboul J. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006;34(5).

MICROMEDEX® Healthcare Series: Thomson Micromedex, Greenwood Village, Colorado (accessed August, 2011).

 

About the author

Mike McEvoy, PhD, REMT-P, RN, CCRN is the EMS Coordinator for Saratoga County, New York, a paramedic for Clifton Park-Halfmoon Ambulance, and Chief Medical Officer for West Crescent Fire Department. He is a clinical specialist in cardiac surgery and teaches critical care medicine at Albany Medical College. Mike is the EMS editor for Fire Engineering magazine, a popular speaker at EMS, fire, and medical conferences, and lead editor of the Jones & Bartlett textbook, "Critical Care Transport". In his free time, he is an avid hiker and winter mountain climber. Contact Mike at mike.mcevoy@ems1.com.

Comments
The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EMS1.com or its staff.
James Gaines James Gaines Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:52:39 PM Read the article a time or two and one will realize nothing has changed. The author tries to say that O2 and MS are no longer used, but immediately retreats, and describes how medics would still use them the same way they always have, as needed for continued pain after nitro and ASA. I think folks are running out of subjects, and are now trying to restate the same old things in a different manner. Bottom line, treat your patient, not your protocols. Nothing new there.
Alan W. Rose Alan W. Rose Friday, December 02, 2011 1:37:38 PM It's highly unlikely to have chest pain after maximal Nitroglycerine? It's unlikely to see chest pain associated with shortness of breath or heart failure in the prehospital environment? Are we talking about the same earth I work on, or some other planet?
Kelly Junker Kelly Junker Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:01:01 AM "In practice, how would an EMT recognize a patient with an RV infarct and what happens if your patient fails to tell you they took an erectile dysfunction (ED) drug within the previous 24 hours? Well, truth be told, it’s like pornography: you’ll know it when you see it." Really? That's your advise? Also I would like to see the link to the study where Morphine, when used intelligently, was harmful. While pre-hospital medicine should be "evidence based," knee-jerk reactions to every random study are not beneficial.
Jake Bigelow Jake Bigelow Sat Dec 3 11:40:21 PST 2011 http://www.theheart.org/article/516527.do I will note, that knee jerk reactions to your uninformed opinion can lead to a continuation of the same old same old, which neither advances our profession, or medicine forward. If you type Morphine in MI study in Google, you'll find TONS of information regarding it. Morphine has many side effects that reduce myocardial oxygen delivery and are thus potentially harmful to ischemic myocardium, including respiratory depression, bradycardia, and hypotension. The original opinion was that it REDUCED myocardial oxygen demand so it was also analgesic of choice for pain. Now that we know it can be harmful and actually reduce delivery, other analgesics are far better for your patients. Fentenyl for starters. Regarding your opinion on, shit advice about recognizing RV infarct, I agree, the author provided poor information. It is very easy to check V4R. Also considering that something like 60% or more of inferior MIs have right sided involvement, it's a safe bet to assume they all do and give nitro with caution. No need to withhold however. But that is another debate all together.
Kelly Junker Kelly Junker Sat Dec 3 12:36:46 PST 2011 My uniformed opinion? My opinion is based on experience and education. I have used both Fentanyl and Morphine in the course of my employment and I have found both to be beneficial. I have attended multiple lectures where opinions of Cardiologists differ between the two both positive and negative. Both drugs have their positive attributes in certain indications and just blacklisting one based on observational studies is unreasonable. I am not a proponent for any medication, i.e. my evidenced based comment, and new medications come out every day. I give what my protocols allow, and for what best benefits my patient. However, I find rude and demeaning responses to comments asking for facts just as unhelpful to the process.
Jake Bigelow Jake Bigelow Sat Dec 3 12:45:04 PST 2011 Kelly Junker Correlation does not equal causation. Just because you believe that your experiences with Morphine in the presence of MI were beneficial does not mean that the studies done on thousands of patients is wrong. If you interpreted my statement as offensive, then I apologize, it was not meant to be. A differing opinion always exists, especially in the medical field, but as Paramedics, we are still in the dark ages because of our history of just accepting what is shoved down our throats and never seeking out the knowledge, or research, to change it. That is why we still "put them on their head" when they are hypotensive, or spinal immobilize based on mechanism. It is not an issue with you, or I, but with our profession in general.
Kyle Leary Kyle Leary Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:05:21 AM As noted already the treatment is the same 99% of the time oxygen is going to do more benefit to your patient than contradictions. Bottom line is if symptoms are there and your impression of the patient matches than treat the patient with the right care. Don't look into the small statistics and treat for the patients benefit.
Jake Bigelow Jake Bigelow Sat Dec 3 11:42:55 PST 2011 Are we talking high flow, or O2 titrated to an SPO2 of 94% or greater? There is a difference. It is important to note that there is evidence to show that hypersaturation can lead to vasoconstriction.
Jake Bigelow Jake Bigelow Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:24:32 AM The Trendelenburg position has time and time again proved to be a myth when treating hypotension, even if you do cause it with Nitro. The author has obviously done some research and seems fairly intelligent, but missed this part of the evidence out there that debunks a lot of what we do. Every study done on it since its creation in WWI has proven it does not work, not even a little. Furthermore, the creator of the position, a few years after the invention of it, recanted and stated that it is actually worthless. It was too late however, and made it's way into our teachings. It needs to be removed, and articles like this don't help.
Rez Medic Rez Medic Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:41:42 AM Well, I can say: Regardless of "Statistics" I have seen Trendelenburg work with my own two eyes. Sooooo..
Nick Adams Nick Adams Saturday, December 03, 2011 8:42:25 AM I'm not exactly 100% agreeable with all these changes and some of the things stated in this article or comments made after. I'm not a MD.....just a Paramedic, but I do know a little bit about cardiology and MI's. First of all, I'd like to address the O2 theory. While I do not totally agree that O2 should be reserved for the pt's who absolutely need it, and there is no evidence to support the benefits of O2 when the SpO2 is greater then 94%. The myocardial ischemia is due to a blockage of the coronary artery.....so we give nitrates the dilate the coronary arteries and restore some blood flow to this ischemic area. there is no question that this benefits the pt. I ask then, why do we restore blood flow to the myocardium with only 95% hemoglobin saturation? Why not 100%? If the pt is saturating @ 96%, I see no harm in starting with O2 lpm to increase SpO2 to 100%. Granted, there is no need to saturate the blood supply to a PaO2 of 250% with a NRB. RVMI - I'd like to address a RVMI. You do a normal 12 lead EKG and see an Inferior MI. That's enough right there to do a prehospital right-sided V4R and check for a proximal LAD occlusion. Even if V4R is elevated, not all RVMI's have preload problems. The patient still needs coronary vasodilation. Prior to giving nitrates, 2 large bore IV's should be administered with 2 1000 bags of saline. If the pt's B/P is acceptable...but soft, you should give a bolus to increase preload before giving nitrates. When the pt's B/P decreases, you could lay him flat, elevate his feet, and give him a fluid challange to increase preload and B/P. If you totally withhold nitrates, you don't vasodilate the coronary arteries, and therefore never get blood restored to the area that it needs to go. Morphine - How exactly does Morphine cause harm to the pt? It does cause histamine release which will vasodilate the patient. This decreases preload and myocardial workload (if the pt has HTN) Decreasing myocardial workload decreases myocardial O2 consumption and demand, which saves mycardial muscle. Relieving pain also will decrese anxiety and and therefore HR, which also decreases O2 demand and consumption. in a RVMI with a soft B/P Morphine is not indicated, but we can still relieve the pt's pain with Fentanyl without vasodilation. The goal here is to #1 - Stop platelet aggregation (clot formation), #2 - Vasodilate to restore blood and nutients (oxygen) to the ischemic area, #3 decrease pain, myocardial workload and O2 demand and consumption. #4 - reperfuse with PTCA or CABG.
Michael Swan Michael Swan Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:38:41 AM If you actually read the article, it is aimed at EMT-Basic. The author is also stating that over oxygenation is cause for other problems and not stating that you should withhold nitro if the patient is below 94%.
T.R. Ball T.R. Ball Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:47:13 AM I agree with about 50% of this... enough said.
Lisa A Johnson Lisa A Johnson Saturday, December 03, 2011 4:12:25 PM I think this author should have supported his claims with citations from specific research articles. I can't change my practice without the science to back it up.
Tim Collins Tim Collins Sat Dec 3 16:16:14 PST 2011 No MONA, what the...
Robert Wakeley Robert Wakeley Monday, December 05, 2011 3:00:54 PM Oxygen and morphine are not "on the kibosh" as stated in this article. This is from the current 2010 guidelines: "If the patient is dyspneic, is hypoxemic, or has obvious signs of heart failure, providers. should titrate oxygen therapy to maintain oxyhemoglobin saturation =94%. Morphine is indicated in STEMI when chest discomfort is unresponsive to nitrates. Morphine should be used with caution in unstable angina/non-STEMI, because morphine administration was associated with increased mortality in a large registry." The opening paragraph in this article is VERY misleading.
Peter Bonadonna Peter Bonadonna Tuesday, December 06, 2011 4:55:11 PM If you read the latest insert on Nitro, you will find a warning about using it in early AMI. The drug maker's stance is not to use it in early AMI. The author seems to trivialize hypotension which, in the face of AMI, further reduces flow in the partially obstructed artery (reduced flow clots faster) and deprives injured tissue the flow it needs. I agree that ASA is very important. The other meds should be PRN. Be comfortable with change. Science drives these changes.
Robert Wakeley Robert Wakeley Monday, December 12, 2011 12:08:07 PM Jake - here's a quote straight from the article you cited: "Disturbing questions, no clear answers". Your conclusions, if based on this article, are not valid. You stated in a later post that correlation does not mean cause - I urge you to follow your own advice. Bravo Kelly for standing up for yourself.
Jay Cloud Jay Cloud Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:15:19 PM Having been in this profession for 40 years, it's been my experience that everything changes in medicine, and EMS is no exception. What's old is new, what's new is old, etc, etc. So now we're faced with another AHA ECC Guidelines change. Lets remember these issues: 1) These are guidelines, not laws. I've given up seeing them as gospel. They should not be considered absolute and beyond question. Lets look at what they are evidence based, and in consensus of those in that group, not absolute "proof". Some of the evidence is poorly documented, may not have been in a double blind or placebo based trial, and may even be suspect do to the financial support of the study. So rather than marching lock step in a new direction every 5 years, we as professionals should look at the guidelines as an opportunity. We in EMS could work with our medical directors to evaluate if O2 in the field really does impact the outcome. Can EMT B staff really safely administer ASA and NTG. I have always taught my students (Hi Kelly), that we don't treat the "machine", we treat the patient. I for one have a problem basing O2 administration on the SaO2. But is that a valid thought? Thirty or so years ago we embraced the "golden hour", only to find out later that only about 10% of our load and go patients actually needed it. So here is our opportunity to let OUR research, OUR evidence and OUR input to be presented. WE may prove or disprove the AHA guidelines. Rather than casting stones and hurling insults, lets seize the opportunity, and make OUR experience and evidence known. Just my opinion.
Camilo Olivieri Camilo Olivieri Tue Dec 20 19:32:18 PST 2011 Thank you, Jay... As always hitting the nail in the head.
Larry Sellers Larry Sellers Tue Dec 20 19:38:51 PST 2011 Rabbi Cloud may be the Andy Rooney of EMS. Keep provoking thought Jay.
Audra Ferranti Audra Ferranti Tue Dec 20 19:50:42 PST 2011 Lol... I have always remembered your teaching of treat the pt not the monitor... How many times I have said those same words to residents! And I recently took ACLS and had difficulty with some of the new "guidelines" .....
Steven Payne Steven Payne Tue Dec 20 20:13:01 PST 2011 AHA Changes my teaching up everytime I turn around
Jay Cloud Jay Cloud Tue Dec 20 20:13:57 PST 2011 Same here Steven.
Brad Fuller Brad Fuller Wed Dec 21 00:32:04 PST 2011 RVI, low sats, CHF, unstable angina, and SOB associated with chest pain unlikely to be seen in the prehospital setting? I don't agree but the article is interesting. The treat the patient not the monitor mantra has definitely saved me a couple of times though.
Annjee Kong Annjee Kong Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:44:11 PM Grigsby ( 2011) fom NewZealand concur that high flow oxygen may in fact increase myocardial infarction.