Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Lifesaving information at your fingertips
The One Resource for EMS, EMTs and Paramedics
Policy shift will affect Vt. EMS providers' bottom lines
Related Categories: Software  -  Billing Software

EMS Billing Services Sponsors

Featured Distributors

Featured Product

New Products

Featured Product Categories

EMS Billing Services Article

December 26, 2010
Email Print Comment RSS Bookmark

Policy shift will affect Vt. EMS providers' bottom lines

Starting the first of the year, ambulance companies will have to log their mileage to the 10th of a mile

Brattleboro Reformer

BRATTLEBORO, Vt. — The already razor-thin profit margin at Rescue Inc. is going to get a little thinner next year.

Starting Jan. 1, Rescue, Inc. and every other ambulance company in the country, will receive less money from the federal government for the Medicare and Medicaid patients they transport.

Starting the first of the year, ambulance companies will have to log their mileage to the 10th of a mile.

Companies are currently allowed to round up, but in an effort to trim costs at the federal level, the government will now be asking the drivers to keep a more accurate accounting of the time spent on the road.

Mark Considine, who is chief of operations at Rescue, Inc., said the change will mean a hit of tens of thousands of dollars to the company's bottom line.

"The federal government is trying to trim their expenditures and this is something they are telling us we have to do," Considine said. "It is something we have to accept. Every company out there is going to see a blow to their revenue."

While the change might look slight at first glance, Considine said it is one more financial challenge that ambulance companies have to contend with.

The federal government pays $10.41 for each mile for the first 17 miles, and then $6.87 per mile after that.

On top of rising fuel prices, insurance spikes for employees and an increase in the cost of disposable medical supplies, he said even a small change like the one that is going into place on Jan. 1 is going to be felt on the company's financial statement.

And he said the company is doing what it can to prevent a significant rate increase for the member towns

"We are trying to be careful. Everyone is having trouble in this economy," Considine said. "We are being very careful not to put too much of a strain on the local economy. We are trying to live on a tight budget while still providing good service."

Jim Finger, president of the Vermont Ambulance Association, said the change in mileage reimbursement comes on top of the already low rate that the federal government provides to ambulance companies for Medicare and Medicaid transport.

Finger said the federal government pays companies between 6 and 17 percent less than what it cost to transport patients.

There has also not been an increase in two years and he said that when the rates were established the government, in a sense, said that at least companies were allowed to round their mileage up to make up some of the difference.

Now that too is being taken way.

"The federal government already does not pay what it costs," said Finger. "It might sound like the right thing to do, to track the mileage accurately, but it means companies are losing more money for every mile they drive. It is not a good situation."

The change is expected to save the federal government between $40 and $80 million a year.

And while that might make an impact on the federal budget, rural ambulance services in Vermont are also going to see the effect on their budgets.

"Companies are already working from the perspective that they are not earning what it cost to deliver patients," said Vermont Department of Health EMS Director Dan Manz. "At the end of the day it all comes off the bottom line."

Copyright 2010 MediaNews Group, Inc. and New England Newspaper Group Inc.

LexisNexis Copyright © 2012 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.   
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy

All Rights Reserved


Comments
The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EMS1.com or its staff.
No comments