Make this page my home page
  1. Drag the home icon in this panel and drop it onto the "house icon" in the tool bar for the browser

  2. Select "Yes" from the popup window and you're done!

Lifesaving information at your fingertips
The One Resource for EMS, EMTs and Paramedics
A better way to backboard

Patient Immobilization & Splints Sponsors

Featured Distributors

Featured Product

New Products

Featured Product Categories

EMS Patient Immobilization & Splints Article



The Ambulance Driver's Perspective
by Kelly Grayson

A better way to backboard

Despite a growing body of evidence that it may indeed do harm to some, spinal motion restriction remains the de facto standard of care in most EMS systems

By Kelly Grayson

File this one under "tips to make ineffective and potentially harmful practices a little easier." Despite the fact that a Cochrane Review of the available literature on prehospital spinal immobilization concluded that there is no evidence of benefit to patients with spinal injuries, and a growing body of evidence that it may indeed do harm to some, spinal motion restriction remains the de facto standard of care in most EMS systems.

Even with spinal clearance algorithms, we still backboard a lot of people. Whether or not EMTs in 2031 look back at us as woefully misguided for strapping our injured patients to hard plastic boards, right now in 2011, we owe it to our patients to make the procedure as smooth as possible.

We've all been there: we've carefully assessed our patient, had a partner hold manual stabilization of the cervical spine, applied a cervical collar, log-rolled the patient onto his side and checked his posterior torso, wedged a backboard in place, log-rolled him back onto the board…

… and then bent his back like a parenthesis as we pushed him laterally to center him on the spine board.

Sometimes it's an error in communication causing the movement to be poorly coordinated among the rescuers. Other times the patient is large and difficult to move. Quite often, the patient's bulky wallet in his hip pocket hung on the near edge of the board, causing you to do just what you were trying to avoid: excessive manipulation of the spine.

It's actually pretty uncommon for a patient to be perfectly centered on the board after we've log-rolled them onto it. Most of them need to be shifted to some degree. The question is how you accomplish that centering movement with the least amount of manipulation.

To minimize manipulation, place the board about 18 inches higher than the patient's head when you log-roll them onto their side. Wedge the board under the patient, and log-roll them back onto the board. You'll find that the patient is still not centered on the board, with their feet and lower legs hanging off the end of the board and their head 18 inches too low.

Have the rescuer holding C-spine stabilization brace the head of the board against his foot. At his direction, the other rescuers grab the patient by the torso and the hips, and slide the patient up into the proper position on the board.

Centering the patient that way accomplishes the move by moving the patient along the long axis of the spine, rather than against it, and the end result is less potential manipulation of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Practice it a few times with a manikin or a healthy volunteer, and then try it in the field. I'm betting you'll find that it works better.

About the author


Kelly Grayson, NREMT-P, CCEMT-P, is a critical care paramedic in Louisiana. He has spent the past 18 years as a field paramedic, critical care transport paramedic, field supervisor and educator. He is a former president of the Louisiana EMS Instructor Society and board member of the LA Association of Nationally Registered EMTs.

He is a frequent EMS conference speaker and contributor to various EMS training texts, and is the author of the popular blog A Day In the Life of an Ambulance Driver. The paperback version of Kelly's book is available at booksellers nationwide. You can follow him on Twitter (@AmboDriver) or Facebook (www.facebook.com/theambulancedriverfiles), or email him at kelly.grayson@ems1.com.


Comments
The comments below are member-generated and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of EMS1.com or its staff.
Roger Tarre Roger Tarre Thursday, January 12, 2012 2:19:03 PM Excellent idea, I'll try that next time, Thanks Kelly!
Audrie Dugger Audrie Dugger Thursday, January 12, 2012 2:21:29 PM You mean, use the z-slide? I was hoping you were going to comment on why it can really harm your patient to neglect padding the board. If I had to estimate, patients are loaded on to backboards with zero padding about 90% of the time. Why do EMS professionals think it is okay to skip this step?
Paul Leonard Covey Paul Leonard Covey Thursday, January 12, 2012 2:45:23 PM Excellent... This should be a protocol that is standard in the teaching process.
Tim Hensley Tim Hensley Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:13:10 PM Very interesting. I will have to remember this. We started using back raft on our back boards. I work offshore and we don't have that many that we send in on back boards luckily. Worked very well the one time we have used it so far. Takes care of the upper body voids and pads the head even with CID in place. I was impressed with it.
Reid Jackson Reid Jackson Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:16:12 PM That's how they taught us to do it in EMT school. So much so that the first time I did it as a student (on a classmate) my instructor was like "No, no, no! You need to do it this way."
John H Dennis III John H Dennis III Thursday, January 12, 2012 6:34:11 PM My thoughts too Audrie...padding said board with a bath blanket that doubles as the way to maneuver the patient on the board without moving the patient's spine seems rather common sense, but...